<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we ignoring the new AMO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nancib.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/are-we-ignoring-the-new-amo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nancib.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/are-we-ignoring-the-new-amo/</link>
	<description>Nanci Barthelmess' blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:26:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Basil Hashem</title>
		<link>http://nancib.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/are-we-ignoring-the-new-amo/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Basil Hashem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancib.wordpress.com/?p=310#comment-593</guid>
		<description>@KLB: Just to clear the air, I was so overwhelmed with comments and feedback, etc... that I didn&#039;t get a chance to moderate my blog. I don&#039;t delete comments only spam. You can see all the comments in all their glory on my blog. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KLB: Just to clear the air, I was so overwhelmed with comments and feedback, etc&#8230; that I didn&#8217;t get a chance to moderate my blog. I don&#8217;t delete comments only spam. You can see all the comments in all their glory on my blog. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanci Barthelmess</title>
		<link>http://nancib.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/are-we-ignoring-the-new-amo/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanci Barthelmess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancib.wordpress.com/?p=310#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reposting your comments, KLB. That Askimet page can get confusing sometimes. :p

I&#039;m noticing that it&#039;s hard to find negative comments about it on &quot;official&quot; sites. You can post them on Mozillazine, but it looks like it&#039;s the only place the dissenters have to post comments without getting treated like you missed a serving of Kooliad. Please let your friends know Peng and I want any kind of comments, both positive and negative, to our posts. I only delete posts that are clearly spam or outright flames. Dissension is good, treating someone like they&#039;re a moron for not agreeing with someone else is bad. Although if you do something really stupid like redesign a community website that is so much less usable than the old version we&#039;ll call you on it. Just like if you set up blog comments that insist on identifying a commenter by their email addy. (I&#039;m looking at you, Major League Baseball.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reposting your comments, KLB. That Askimet page can get confusing sometimes. :p</p>
<p>I&#8217;m noticing that it&#8217;s hard to find negative comments about it on &#8220;official&#8221; sites. You can post them on Mozillazine, but it looks like it&#8217;s the only place the dissenters have to post comments without getting treated like you missed a serving of Kooliad. Please let your friends know Peng and I want any kind of comments, both positive and negative, to our posts. I only delete posts that are clearly spam or outright flames. Dissension is good, treating someone like they&#8217;re a moron for not agreeing with someone else is bad. Although if you do something really stupid like redesign a community website that is so much less usable than the old version we&#8217;ll call you on it. Just like if you set up blog comments that insist on identifying a commenter by their email addy. (I&#8217;m looking at you, Major League Baseball.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KLB</title>
		<link>http://nancib.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/are-we-ignoring-the-new-amo/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>KLB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancib.wordpress.com/?p=310#comment-583</guid>
		<description>I posted comments that were critical (but constructive) to Basil Hashem&#039;s blog and they were deleted.  It would seem that they are trying to whitewash things to make it seem that everyone loves the new AMO site.  I guess they figure if they tell everyone how great the new AMO site is everyone will believe them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted comments that were critical (but constructive) to Basil Hashem&#8217;s blog and they were deleted.  It would seem that they are trying to whitewash things to make it seem that everyone loves the new AMO site.  I guess they figure if they tell everyone how great the new AMO site is everyone will believe them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peng</title>
		<link>http://nancib.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/are-we-ignoring-the-new-amo/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Peng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancib.wordpress.com/?p=310#comment-581</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve intentionally not commented here sooner. Every time I read &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=642440&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the thread about it on Mozillazine&lt;/a&gt; I get pissed off all over again. It&#039;s bad enough that so many people are pissed off about the new Abomination.Mozilla.Org that the mods have to keep reminding us to try to keep things civil and productive. The bottom line is that the new site (aside from looking a hell of a lot like the PriceGrabber website) looks that it was designed by a bunch of idiotic 20somethings who love MySpace, Facebook and all the Web 2.0 sites simply because &quot;they&#039;re Web 2.0 so how can there be anything wrong with them?&quot; (No offense intended to the 20somethings who give a damn about usability and realize that so many of these damned sites that are supposed to be so &quot;cool&quot; are actually some of the most useless bits of code ever cobbled together by a bunch of semi-trained monkeys.)

I have to say one thing for sure. The new AMO could be the one thing that keeps me using Firefox 3.0 when it comes out. The new Get Add-ons tab in the Addons Manager is about the only thing that can shield me from having to use AMO. If an addon isn&#039;t available via the new tab and I don&#039;t have a developer&#039;s website to get it from I honestly don&#039;t need to use the addon. I am leaning heavily to roll back to Fx2 once Fx3 is out and I write a final review of it. Of course one added benefit is that I have just about everything I want for Firefox 2 (so much is still unavailable for fx3, like OSX-look themes for Linux users) that I may never need AMO again if I stay with Fx2. God knows there&#039;s so much info that I can no longer get from the site since the redesign.

Now I understand why CatThief and other addon devs refuse to have their addons listed on AMO. They&#039;ve managed to avoid the spike in their blood pressure without even trying.

Why don&#039;t I file or vote for bugs about Abomination.Mozilla.org? Because I doubt that the best solution will ever be used, no matter how much sense it makes. The solution? To admit that their fresh out of college &quot;designers&quot; have well and truly screwed the pooch on this one, to eat the money they paid for the upgrade, and to roll back to the old interface. Or at the very least give us the option of using the &quot;old school&quot; AMO interface and not the crap that got rolled out with so little warning to &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt;. I&#039;ve wasted enough bandwidth trying to point out that if Mozilla says betas of Fx3 are not for everyone than it has no business being the default browser for Ubuntu Hardy. I&#039;m not wasting any of Bugzilla&#039;s bandwidth even addressing the new abomination or mine dealing with bugs that might as well get flagged WONTFIX. My doctor&#039;s pretty glad, too. My blood pressure got &lt;em&gt;way&lt;/em&gt; too fraking high since the upgrade.

@Nanc:
It&#039;s too bad you&#039;ve closed your SL store. I wonder how a &quot;Frak AMO&quot; tee would sell.  I know I&#039;d want to buy one, and I&#039;m almost never on SL anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve intentionally not commented here sooner. Every time I read <a href="http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=642440" rel="nofollow">the thread about it on Mozillazine</a> I get pissed off all over again. It&#8217;s bad enough that so many people are pissed off about the new Abomination.Mozilla.Org that the mods have to keep reminding us to try to keep things civil and productive. The bottom line is that the new site (aside from looking a hell of a lot like the PriceGrabber website) looks that it was designed by a bunch of idiotic 20somethings who love MySpace, Facebook and all the Web 2.0 sites simply because &#8220;they&#8217;re Web 2.0 so how can there be anything wrong with them?&#8221; (No offense intended to the 20somethings who give a damn about usability and realize that so many of these damned sites that are supposed to be so &#8220;cool&#8221; are actually some of the most useless bits of code ever cobbled together by a bunch of semi-trained monkeys.)</p>
<p>I have to say one thing for sure. The new AMO could be the one thing that keeps me using Firefox 3.0 when it comes out. The new Get Add-ons tab in the Addons Manager is about the only thing that can shield me from having to use AMO. If an addon isn&#8217;t available via the new tab and I don&#8217;t have a developer&#8217;s website to get it from I honestly don&#8217;t need to use the addon. I am leaning heavily to roll back to Fx2 once Fx3 is out and I write a final review of it. Of course one added benefit is that I have just about everything I want for Firefox 2 (so much is still unavailable for fx3, like OSX-look themes for Linux users) that I may never need AMO again if I stay with Fx2. God knows there&#8217;s so much info that I can no longer get from the site since the redesign.</p>
<p>Now I understand why CatThief and other addon devs refuse to have their addons listed on AMO. They&#8217;ve managed to avoid the spike in their blood pressure without even trying.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t I file or vote for bugs about Abomination.Mozilla.org? Because I doubt that the best solution will ever be used, no matter how much sense it makes. The solution? To admit that their fresh out of college &#8220;designers&#8221; have well and truly screwed the pooch on this one, to eat the money they paid for the upgrade, and to roll back to the old interface. Or at the very least give us the option of using the &#8220;old school&#8221; AMO interface and not the crap that got rolled out with so little warning to <em>anyone</em>. I&#8217;ve wasted enough bandwidth trying to point out that if Mozilla says betas of Fx3 are not for everyone than it has no business being the default browser for Ubuntu Hardy. I&#8217;m not wasting any of Bugzilla&#8217;s bandwidth even addressing the new abomination or mine dealing with bugs that might as well get flagged WONTFIX. My doctor&#8217;s pretty glad, too. My blood pressure got <em>way</em> too fraking high since the upgrade.</p>
<p>@Nanc:<br />
It&#8217;s too bad you&#8217;ve closed your SL store. I wonder how a &#8220;Frak AMO&#8221; tee would sell.  I know I&#8217;d want to buy one, and I&#8217;m almost never on SL anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWSCO</title>
		<link>http://nancib.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/are-we-ignoring-the-new-amo/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>AWSCO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancib.wordpress.com/?p=310#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Amen...

As a user not a developer, I can&#039;t find a darn thing now...

I posted complaints at the referenced site that were deleted...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen&#8230;</p>
<p>As a user not a developer, I can&#8217;t find a darn thing now&#8230;</p>
<p>I posted complaints at the referenced site that were deleted&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
